Piperic Business Intelligence

similar sites

Sites similar to jeilpack.com

제일팩-실링용기,돈까스용기,탕용기전문 · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation

7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

연스바구니

6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

송월타월 | 타월 제조 전문업체, 수건, 타올

6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

라이틀오브젝트

6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

하즈블루365 | 자연주의로 시작하는 건강한 아름다움

6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

우산양산전문 협동양산 :: HYUPDONG

6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

jjunysupply.com

JJUNY SUPPLY | 당신의 완벽한 오피스 라이프

6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

jemappllemanon.com

쥬마펠마농

5 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

5 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

feliziashop.com

펠리시아샵 Feliziahop 실내 야외 놀이 In & Out Door Play

6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

보호대는 보호대몰

7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

찐램프-JJINLAMP

7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

가구 전문 포메리트

6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

본타몰 세계요리재료 전문몰

6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

co-citations how often the same third-party websites link out to both — sites referenced together tend to serve the same world.
shared tech how much of their technology stack (CMS, e‑commerce, analytics, frameworks…) overlaps.
shared category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
positioning how closely their titles and on‑page wording line up.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.