similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to jeffscarpenter.com

Jeffscarpenter alternatives & similar sites

Jeff S Carpenter — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Executive Leadership And Management →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ianlimbaga.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ian Limbaga — Humanity-centered product, design and AI leadership	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
enterneering.app ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Enterneering® App	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heyandycarroll.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Andy Carroll \| Product Leadership & AI	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rmcauthor.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home - Robin M Carroll Career Portfolio	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
studioceria.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Studio Ceria – Conversations with leaders shaping culture and communities	United States~ en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dontbehapless.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Hey, I’m Hap. \| Notion	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
mindsintech.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Enterprise Leadership Program	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trestewart.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Tre Stewart - Design Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dravid.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Avniel Dravid \| Product Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rlynchenterprises.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	HOME - R Lynch Enterprises	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chuckgriffithdesign.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Chuck Griffith Design	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kylemayne.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Kyle Mayne	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mindt-kries.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Product & Design Leadership - Mindt-Kries	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hochuzhrrat.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Anastasia Turulina — Independent Product Design Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adarshchaturvedi.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Adarsh Chaturvedi: India's Top Entrepreneur \| Adarsh Chaturvedi	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acagrove.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Acagrove \| Organizational Change, Startup Ecosystem Building, Leadership Development, and Growth Strategies \| Organizational Change, Startups, Innovation Labs, Leadership Development, and Growth Strategies	en	executive-leadership-and-management Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iamhatch.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Hatch - Experiential Interventions	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
helvydesign.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Helvydesign	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.