Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jeffmellem.com

Home · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
45match
elaineaugustine.com
Home
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorypainting
42match
jinkangkunstworks.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydrawing-and-sketching
40match
janetoliverstudio.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydrawing-and-sketching
40match
dianewilkin.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydrawing-and-sketching
39match
genieporetzky-lee.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydrawing-and-sketching
35match
jillgoodell.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryworkshops-and-classes
35match
fergusaryan.com
home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorypainting
35match
fergusryan.com
home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorypainting
35match
cmstudio.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydrawing-and-sketching
32match
juliakoivumaa.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorypainting
32match
jimalberter.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorypainting
32match
grigor-asoyan.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorypainting
32match
guidomigianoart.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorypainting
32match
cdartstudio.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorypainting
32match
coralmoonstudios.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorypainting
32match
dickjohnsonsdatabank.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorycollecting
32match
hanelova.com
Home
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorypainting
30match
julielounibos.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorypainting

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.