Piperic Business Intelligence

similar sites

Sites similar to jebaco.com

제바코 · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation

1 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categorywomen-s-clothing

1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorywomen-s-accessories

1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care

제이엠스킨랩

0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryskin-care

applekimbeauty.com

애플킴뷰티 applekimbeauty

0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorybeauty

자연유랩 Jayeonulab

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care

힐리시 | 일상의 가벼움과 편안함

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorywomen-s-clothing

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorywomen-s-clothing

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care

비피플러스 | 건강한 빛을 담은 뷰티

1 co-citations0 shared tech3 shared categoryskin-care

0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorywomen-s-accessories

majoongmoolshop.com

0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybeauty

0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryperfume-and-fragrance

[JEMUTSHOP]::BASIC CASUAL BRAND::

0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymen-s-clothing

짚불연구소

0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorywomen-s-clothing

HASUHANTE | 하수한테

0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorywomen-s-fashion

비누미 | 자연을 담은 피부의 안전함

0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorynatural-and-organic-beauty

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

co-citations how often the same third-party websites link out to both — sites referenced together tend to serve the same world.
shared tech how much of their technology stack (CMS, e‑commerce, analytics, frameworks…) overlaps.
shared category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
positioning how closely their titles and on‑page wording line up.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.