Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jcifelli.dev

John Cifelli — Product Manager · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
kurtisbodrogi.com
Kurtis Bodrogi — Product Manager
1 shared topicsstartups
72match
farahtsaraiva.com
Lucas Farahat | Staff Product Manager @ Deel
1 shared topicsstartups
71match
benita.me
Nir Benita — Product Builder
1 shared topicsstartups
71match
arshia.io
Arshia Moghaddam — Product Builder
1 shared topicsstartups
70match
8li.io
8LI — Senior Product & Technical Partnership
1 shared topicsstartups
70match
8thlanei.com
8LI — Senior Product & Technical Partnership
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
abur.io
Arthur Burnichon - Product Maker
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
inventorblueprint.com
Inventor Blueprint — Patent Product Builder
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
binnendijk.net
Valentin Binnendijk — Product Leader & Entrepreneur
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
grzstudio.com
GRZ Studio — Digital Product & Design Studio
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
thejuicycow.com
Pierre Sauvignon — Web Entrepreneur with a Product Bias
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
arshtec.com
ARSHtec - Product-focused!
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
bmonish.com
Monish B | Technical Product Partner
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
pinebase.io
Pinebase - Product Studio for Founders
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
bobilabs.dev
Bobi Labs, independent product studio
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
doihavepmf.com
Do I Have Product-Market Fit?
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
nhatt.com
NHΛT TRΛN - Senior Product Engineer
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
intervoolai.com
Intervool — Customer research that drives product decisions
1 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.