Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jayungreen.com

J.Green · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
85match
coverdbon.com
COVERDBON
7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
85match
cowellcosmedi.com
코웰
7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
81match
jangins.com
장인닷컴 | 장인의 기술, 우리의 일상
7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
81match
japjidoctor.com
잡지닥터
7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
81match
bangzza.com
방짜배터리
7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
80match
cpromarine.com
씨프로마린
6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
77match
bogangst.com
(주)보강에스티
7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
76match
jiinshop.com
지인샵-의미있는쇼핑공간-志人#
6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
76match
bontamall.com
본타몰 세계요리재료 전문몰
7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
75match
balance-bloon.com
발란스블룬
7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
75match
geumran.com
금란상사
7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorygrocery-shopping
73match
jjbooboomall.com
정전부부몰
6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
73match
arosaegida.com
아로새기다 - 각인악세사리 전문 쇼핑몰♥
6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
72match
arangmall.com
아랑
5 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
71match
jemischool.com
대한민국 대표 문구전문쇼핑몰 모닝오피스
6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
71match
5pentagrip.com
펜타그립
6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
70match
jjincodi.com
찐코디
6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
70match
jiwoopam.com
지우팜
6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.