Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jaynerivers.com

Jayne Rivers · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
85match
ivyflamebooks.com
Ivy Flame
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
85match
elishalark.com
Elisha Lark
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
85match
marenvanessen.com
Maren van Essen
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
85match
margotmoonbooks.com
Margot Moon
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
78match
jennayoungromance.com
Jenna Young
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
78match
janetvarityauthor.com
Janet Varity
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
78match
breeharlow.com
Bree Harlow
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
73match
maisondeloup.com
Maison De Loup
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
73match
corayoungbooks.com
Cora Young
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
70match
jillyharrisonauthor.com
Jilly Harrison
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
70match
coracraneauthor.com
Cora Crane
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
70match
fiddakabir.com
Fidda Kabir
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
69match
mandiraynes.com
Mandi Raynes
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
68match
joesatoria.com
Joe Satoria │ MM Romance Author
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
68match
dhrenfroe.com
DH Renfroe
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
68match
elamypride.com
Elamy Pride
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
66match
hanameadows.com
Hana Meadows
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
63match
jameymoodyauthor.com
Jamey Moody
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.