Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jaydgoss.com

Jay Goss · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
aalazz.me
Alexis Lazzarotto — Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
mat3o.com
Matthew Nowicki
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
matroussilhe.com
Mathieu Roussilhe
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
max-heller.com
Max Heller | Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
roddehugo.com
Hugo Rodde
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
mcraepetrey.com
McRae Petrey | Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
kubilaycan.com
Kubilay CAN
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
gulotta.dev
Gulotta Solutions | Software Engineering Solutions
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
albaraamansour.dev
Al-Baraa Mansour
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
maxhogan.dev
Max Hogan
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
mearl.dev
Mearl | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
rkknox.com
Richard Knox
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
romanrux.com
ROMAN RUX — software engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
gustavogarfias.com
Gustavo Garfias — iOS Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
armanbedrosyan.com
Arman Bedrosyan | Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
dobronich.com
Ignacio Dobronich
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
roberteshleman.com
Robert Eshleman
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
rohangottipati.com
Rohan Gottipati - Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.