similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to java-hunter.de

Java Hunter alternatives & similar sites

DATAGROUP - IT Dienstleister auf Augenhöhe — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Business I T →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
it-informatik.de ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	DATAGROUP - IT Dienstleister auf Augenhöhe	Germany de	business-i-t HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
javahunter.de ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	DATAGROUP - IT Dienstleister auf Augenhöhe	Germany de	business-i-t HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datagroup.ch ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	DATAGROUP - IT Dienstleister auf Augenhöhe	Switzerland de	business-i-t HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deminet.ch ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	demicomp onward ag - Ihr IT-Dienstleister aus Chur	Switzerland de	business-i-t	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
hth-computer.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	IT-Dienstleister Raum Köln/Bonn \| IT Service \| IT-Systemhaus KMU	de	business-i-t WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hthgruppe.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	IT-Dienstleister Raum Köln/Bonn \| IT Service \| IT-Systemhaus KMU	de	business-i-t WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acea.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	ACEA Ihr IT-Dienstleister aus München	Germany de	business-i-t DotNetNuke/DNN	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
agena.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	IT-Dienstleister der GU-Gruppe \| AGENA GmbH	Germany de	business-i-t Pimcore Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
auster.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Auster Digital \| Digital Business Engineering für Dienstleister	de	business-i-t WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agon-it.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	AGON GmbH - IT-Dienstleistungen und Verkaufen auf Marktplätzen \| AGON GmbH	Germany de	business-i-t	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agon-agentur.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	AGON GmbH - IT-Dienstleistungen und Verkaufen auf Marktplätzen \| AGON GmbH	Germany de	business-i-t	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
islogic.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	isLOGIC AG – IT für Finanzdienstleister	Germany de	business-i-t WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
businessitsolutions.ch ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	bits ag - Business IT Services AG - SAP Dienstleistungen	Switzerland de	business-i-t WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
businessitservices.ch ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	bits ag - Business IT Services AG - SAP Dienstleistungen	Switzerland de	business-i-t WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
business-it-services.ch ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	bits ag - Business IT Services AG - SAP Dienstleistungen	Switzerland de	business-i-t WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
itservicekoeln.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	IT-Service & Dienstleistungen für Unternehmen	Germany de	business-i-t	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janspikowius.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	IT-Dienstleistung & IT- und KI-Beratung \| Jan Spikowius	Germany de	business-i-t WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
neo-ms.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	IT-Dienstleistungen & Buchhaltungsservice \| neo Management Services	de	business-i-t WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.