Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jasonformat.com

JASON Format · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
65match
ianfleeton.com
Ian Fleeton
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryprogramming-languages
65match
ankitlohar.com
Developer Terminal
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryprogramming-languages
63match
iamfredric.com
Resources‚ articles and shenanigans for web developers | Fredrics cyberspace
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development
62match
bytesbites.io
BytesBites | Blog by Vincent Rolea. I write about software development and management mostly using Ruby and Rails.
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryprogramming-languages
61match
michalzalecki.com
Michal Zalecki - Personal Blog on Software Development
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryprogramming-languages
61match
manrueda.com
Index | Manuel Rueda Blog
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryprogramming-languages
61match
manrueda.dev
Index | Manuel Rueda Blog
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryprogramming-languages
61match
dkotama.com
I Nyoman Darma Kotama Blog | A blog about web development, programming, and technology.
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development
60match
michaelpavkovic.com
Michael Pavkovic's Blog
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
60match
michaelhly.com
Michael Huang
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development
60match
michaelth.com
michael theodorides
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryprogramming-languages
60match
miguelcast.dev
Miguel Cast
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.