Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jasondebacker.com

Jason DeBacker · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
55match
matt-obrien.com
Matthew OBrien
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy
54match
javierbianchi.com
Javier Bianchi
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy
54match
marcfulmer.com
Marc Fulmer, PhD | Economist and Data Scientist
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy
54match
cesarbarilla.com
César Barilla ·
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy
54match
mariakogelnik.com
Maria Kogelnik
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy
54match
gerda-asmus.com
Dr. Gerda Asmus · Bluhm
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy
53match
diegofasano.com
Diego Fasano — Portfolio
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy
53match
jasmiths.com
Andrew Smith · Home
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeducation-industry
53match
gregorylevieuge.com
Grégory Levieuge – Economist
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy
53match
devisdecet.com
Home | Devis Decet
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy
53match
dheeravashia.com
Dheer Avashia — Portfolio
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy
52match
federicoatz.com
Federico Atzori, Ph.D.
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy
50match
julianapinillos.com
Juliana Pinillos | Economics PhD
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy
50match
manan-patel.com
Manan Patel — Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy
50match
manormcgee.com
Home
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy
50match
manuellopezpaz.com
Manuel Lopez Paz
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy
50match
jasminehao.com
Jasmine Hao - Assistant Professor
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy
50match
jaypgarg.com
Jay Garg
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryeconomy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.