Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to janetmathias.com

JANET MATHIAS · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
85match
annarpaul.com
Anna R. Paul
1 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorypainting
75match
annewalkerart.com
Anne Walker
1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorypainting
70match
deborahkatz.com
Deborah Katz
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorypainting
70match
nielsburger.com
Niels Burger
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydrawing-and-sketching
70match
roedervirginiao.com
Virginia O. Roeder
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorypainting
68match
rachelvolpone.com
rachel volpone
1 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorypainting
68match
annemcgurk.com
Anne McGurk
1 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorypainting
65match
inglisstudio.com
Peter Inglis Sketch Artist
1 co-citations3 shared tech0 shared categorydrawing-and-sketching
62match
alannafagan.com
A L A N N A F A G A N
1 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorypainting
62match
jenahk.com
Jena H. Kim
1 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorypainting
62match
ronbimrose.com
Ron Bimrose
1 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorypainting
62match
suejinjo.com
Suejin Jo
1 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorypainting
60match
annienashart.com
Annie Nash
1 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorypainting
60match
jillbayor.com
Jill Bayor
1 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorypainting
54match
annienorbeck.com
ANNIE NORBECK
1 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorypainting
50match
ingridbarreneche.com
Ingrid Barreneche
0 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorypainting
50match
studiotraipoom.com
STUDIO TRAIPOOM
0 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorypainting
50match
suemcnally.com
SUE MCNALLY
0 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorypainting

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.