Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to janeapp.com

Jane App - Practice Management Software for Health & Wellness Practitioners - Jane App · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
52match
bythecuff.com
UNBOXED. | Cranberry Compac™ Nitrile Gloves
4 co-citations5 shared tech2 shared categorymedical-health
49match
iloveaxiommedical.com
Axiom Medical - Injury Case Management & Occupational Health Experts
5 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorymedical-health
49match
kaltros.com
Welcome To Kaltros
4 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorymedical-health
49match
embodiaapp.com
Embodia
4 co-citations5 shared tech2 shared categorymedical-health
49match
embodiaacademy.com
Embodia
4 co-citations5 shared tech2 shared categorymedical-health
48match
kavnhealth.com
KAVN Health | Psychiatry & Veteran Mental Health Services located in Columbia, MD and Alexandria, VA
5 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorymental-health
48match
emecompany.com
EME Company | Veteran-Owned Medical Textile Manufacturer Made in USA
4 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorymedical-health
46match
gcbmedicalsupply.com
GCB Medical
3 co-citations5 shared tech2 shared categorymedical-health
46match
mediforcesolutions.com
MediForce Solutions
4 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorymedical-health
46match
docentraapp.com
Docentra | Patient Data Management System for Doctors in Sri Lanka
4 co-citations2 shared categorymedical-health
46match
elixiahealth.com
Clinical Trial Management & Site Operations | Empathx
4 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorymedical-health
46match
empathxclinical.com
Clinical Trial Management & Site Operations | Empathx
4 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorymedical-health

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.