Piperic Business Intelligence

similar sites

Sites similar to jamttioa.com

jamttioa · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation

0 co-citations1 shared tech3 shared categoryhousehold-supplies

0 co-citations1 shared tech3 shared categoryshopping

0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryhousehold-supplies

0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryhousehold-supplies

0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryhousehold-supplies

0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryhousehold-supplies

0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryhousehold-supplies

0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryshopping

0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryshopping

0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryhousehold-supplies

オンラインストア

0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryhousehold-supplies

0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryhousehold-supplies

0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryshopping

0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryhousehold-supplies

0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryhousehold-supplies

0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryhousehold-supplies

0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryshopping

高品質低価格のオンラインショップ

0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryhousehold-supplies

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

co-citations how often the same third-party websites link out to both — sites referenced together tend to serve the same world.
shared tech how much of their technology stack (CMS, e‑commerce, analytics, frameworks…) overlaps.
shared category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
positioning how closely their titles and on‑page wording line up.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.