Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jamesstorr.com

James Storr · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
58match
jnshaw.com
James Shaw
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
55match
jamesvidigal.com
JAMES VIDIGAL
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
55match
jgrimshaw.com
James Grimshaw
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
54match
jamesvandeven.com
James van de Ven
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
54match
elistorkey.com
Eli Storkey
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
52match
a-r-j.com
Andrew Robert-James
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
50match
jenhaskins.com
jen haskins main page
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
50match
joelemoure.com
Joseph LeMoure
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
50match
joelgyamera.com
Joel Gyamera
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
50match
juliannaantczak.com
Julianna Antczak
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
50match
juliamirk.com
Julia Mirkiewicz
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
50match
julianopiano.com
About
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
50match
julianpasveer.com
Julian Pasveer
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
50match
juliepoitras.com
Julie Poitras
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
50match
kekskin.com
About
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
50match
kelseywebb.com
Link in Bio
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
50match
mamiealma.com
About
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies
50match
jackkieny.com
Jack Kieny
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybiographies

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.