Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jameshk.com

James Hill-Khurana · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
masonjames.com
Mason James
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
robbiej.dev
RJ Blog
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
drveri.com
Dr Veri – Data Science and Machine Learning News and Tips – Cutting Edge Machine Learning, IoT and Data Science Solutions
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
adventuresinwhy.com
Adventures in Why
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
djorgs.com
Home | Grav
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
dzheglov.com
Dmitry Zheglov | ML Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
rodrigomulsa.com
Rodrigo Chavez
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
rodrigochavez.com
Rodrigo Chavez
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
anlytcs.com
Steve's Machine Learning Blog
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
dkozlov.com
Dmitry Kozlov
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
mateoneira.com
Mateo Neira | Machine Learning, Applied Mathematics, and Network Science
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
alexeyev.org
Leonid Alexeyev
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
arnoldyeung.com
Arnold YS Yeung
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
alexanderschroll.com
Alexander Schroll
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
aadityasinghal.com
Aaditya Singhal
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
thelearningmachine.dev
The Learning Machine
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
billchow.dev
Bill Chow
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
dmitridevaz.com
Dmitri De Vaz
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.