Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jamescrookes.com

JAMES CROOKES – Author | Voiceover & Narrator | Book Design · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
suzannahchua.com
Suzannah Chua – Author | Illustrator | Educator
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
angelamenziesbooks.com
Angela Menzies – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
residentbookgal.com
Resident Book Gal – Author Services
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
andrewreinerauthor.com
Andrew Reiner – Book Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
caiawinter.com
Caia Winter – Author.
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
itsokaytowonder.com
Rhonda Wagner – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
rhondawagnerbook.com
Rhonda Wagner – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
bculverjr.com
bculverjr – Author Page
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
lynnlauber.com
Lynn Lauber – Author, Book Collaborator, Creative Writer
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
m2turnerauthor.com
Michele Turner – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
richoettinger.com
rich oettinger – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
sharonchoebooks.com
sharon choe – author & academic
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
gaylenewilson.com
Gaylene Wilson – Author and Illustrator
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
moniquechenierauthor.com
Monique Chénier – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
basmaakram.com
Basma Akram – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
islastuart.com
Isla Stuart – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
sharamoon.com
Shara Moon – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
susanhiersfoster.com
Susan Hiers Foster – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.