Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jamesandersonwebdev.com

James Anderson | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
dilfoe.dev
Dillon Foenander | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
hendralatumeten.com
Hendra Latumeten | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
antendis.dev
Rohail Sheikh | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
73match
itslouis.dev
Louis F. — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
sunthecoder.com
Sun | Full Stack Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
andreacanton.com
Senior Software Engineer // Andrea Canton
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
antoniotoriz.com
Antonio Toriz - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
gavinmorrice.com
Gavin Morrice - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
anislab.com
Anis Kadri — Sr Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
cameronmcdougal.com
Cameron McDougal - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
gauravsubedi.com
Gaurav Subedi — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
isaiahshiner.com
Isaiah Shiner — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
israelsantiago.com
Israel Santiago — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
reubenmackey.com
Reuben Mackey | Software Engineer | Auckland, NZ
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
ishitavig.com
Ishita Vig — Software Engineer · Sydney
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
anashabib.com
Anas Habib | Full-Stack Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
superari.com
Ari Toren-Herrinton — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
anushamanne.com
Anusha Manne Raby – Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.