Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jamcarvalho.com

João Carvalho · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
caciciafabrizio.com
Fabrizio Cacicia
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
heetmeyer.com
Frederik Heetmeyer
2 shared topicsrobotics
64match
sunweihao26.com
Weihao Sun
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
suveenellawela.com
Suveen Ellawela
2 shared topicsrobotics
64match
swastikmahapatra.com
Swastik Mahapatra
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
magical-engineering.com
Magical Enginering
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
m9nitro.com
Marzanul Momenine | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
gautierarcin.com
Gautier Arcin's Blog | Robotics & Fullstack engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
modelhumanprocessor.com
Model Human Processor
2 shared topicsrobotics
62match
anshulnayak.com
Personal Portfolio | Anshul Nayak
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
antoniolangella.com
Portfolio | Computer Engineer & Roboticist
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
61match
anvikshabusa.com
Title page
2 shared topicsrobotics
61match
ethangoan.com
Ethan Goan
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
61match
1xtechnologies.org
1X | Home Robots
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
61match
sharinginfotech.com
机器人与AI产业 — 探索智能时代的无限可能
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
61match
ethivion.ai
Ethivion | Ethical Intelligent Systems
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
61match
moise-ugwiri.com
Dr. Moise Ugwiri — Industrial AI Engineer, Founder & Writer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
61match
bateman.io
Samuel Maxwell Bateman
2 shared topicsrobotics

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.