Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jakesim.com

Jake Sim | Engineering Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
restauralio.com
Gomez – Portfolio & AI Engineering
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
75match
ankitagupta.com
Ankita Gupta - AI & Data Engineering Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
75match
shekharlabs.com
Shekhar Labs — AI engineering portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
knarvaez.com
AI Product System Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
eswardheekonda.com
AI Engineer Portfolio | Graduate Student
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
itsparam.dev
Parampreet Singh | AI Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
itsparam.app
Parampreet Singh | AI Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
diogoramos.dev
Portfolio | Data Scientist & ML Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
mohsinriad.com
Mohsin | Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
aadhavmani.com
Aadhav's Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
monumo.ai
Reinventing Engineering - Monumo
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
monumo.com
Reinventing Engineering - Monumo
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
suryathota.com
Surya Thota - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
1pitaph.com
1pitaph portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
anhducle.com
Le Anh Duc | Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
garvpatel.com
Garv Patel | Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
sharaawy.com
Sharaawy | Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
knowmywork.app
AI Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.