Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jakejeromewriter.com

Jake Jerome – Writer And Cheap date · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
shatiwrites.com
S. Hati – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
74match
anniebashaw.com
Annie Bashaw – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
73match
camillabruce.com
Camilla Bruce – Writer of the dark and lovely
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
calsetar.com
Calvin Setar – Writer & Editor
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
gavinneale.com
Gavin Neale – Writer | The home of writer and blogger Gavin Neale
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
caitdarfler.com
Cait Darfler – writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
montanarogers.com
Montana Rogers – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
kpedenbooks.com
ByKatieEden – Writer based in the UK
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
antonrose.com
Anton Rose – WRITER
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
maedonovan.com
mae donovan – writer | reader | wizard
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
henrybaum.com
Henry Baum.com – Writer And Songwriter
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
kperrin.com
Kate Perrin – writings, updates and ideas
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
angiemichaelis.com
Angie Michaelis – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
annacolekane.com
Anna Cole-Kane – Author – Writer and Author
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
estebancajigas.com
Esteban Cajigas – Fiction Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
itsindiea.com
Indie A – Writing
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
annie-spencer.com
Annie Spencer – writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
ivanbaidak.com
Ivan Baidak – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.