Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jakeforma.com

Jake Auchincloss for Congress · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
herbjonesforvirginia.com
Herb Jones for Congress
2 shared topicspolitics
74match
mac4sc.com
Mac Deford for Congress
2 shared topicselections
73match
dm4mi.com
Donavan McKinney for Congress
2 shared topicspolitics
72match
andyogles.com
Andy Ogles for Congress
2 shared topicspolitics
72match
ridenourforcongress.com
Judge Sheriene Ridenour for Congress
2 shared topicspolitics
72match
koh4ma.com
Dan Koh for Congress
2 shared topicspolitics
72match
becciaforcongress.com
John Beccia for Congress
2 shared topicselections
72match
sheilaforcongress.com
Sheila For Congress
2 shared topicspolitics
72match
m4mi.com
Matt Maasdam for Congress
2 shared topicselections
72match
maasdam4mi.com
Matt Maasdam for Congress
2 shared topicselections
72match
susheelaforcongress.com
Susheela Jayapal for Congress
2 shared topicspolitics
72match
caitlynforgeorgia.com
Caitlyn Gegen For Congress | Georgia's 9th District
2 shared topicselections
71match
bb-4mi.com
Bridget Brink for Congress
2 shared topicspolitics
71match
isiahforcongress.com
Isiah for Congress 2020 | NY-9
2 shared topicspolitics
71match
espinosaforcongress.com
Chris Espinosa for Congress | CA-26 Democrat
2 shared topicspolitics
71match
susieleeforcongress.com
Susie Lee for Congress
2 shared topicselections
71match
antonyghee.com
Tony Ghee – Antony Ghee for Congress
2 shared topicspolitics
70match
comrademarkdavis.com
Mark Davis for Congress | Join the Campaign - Make a Difference
2 shared topicspolitics

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.