Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jakebic.com

Home - Jake Bic · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
arumugampitchai.com
Home - Dr. Arumugam Pitchai
3 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
64match
abhishekdesai.net
Home
3 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
64match
cococubed.com
cococubed home page
3 shared topicsphysics
63match
artigarg.com
Arti Garg's Home Page
3 shared topicsphysics
63match
rodrigonemmen.com
Rodrigo Nemmen's Homepage | University of São Paulo / Associate Professor
3 shared topicsphysics
62match
matteocerruti.com
Matteo Cerruti
3 shared topicsphysics
62match
bengompertz.com
Dr Benjamin Gompertz | Astrophysicist, University of Birmingham
3 shared topicsphysics
62match
adamgginsburg.com
Professor Adam Ginsburg
3 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
62match
interdimensionalfaq.com
Beyond Three Dimensions — InterdimensionalFAQ.com
3 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
62match
massivehand.com
Black hole - Wikipedia
3 shared topicsphysics
61match
thequantumvoid.com
Quantum Void — Science
3 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
61match
robotcabal.com
Observable universe - Wikipedia
3 shared topicsscience
61match
dkbaylisaguirre.com
Dana Baylis-Aguirre (Dr. BA), New Mexico Tech
3 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
61match
themagneticangles.com
Solar Magnetism | The Magnetic Angles
3 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
61match
birdnestllc.org
BirdNest LLC
3 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
61match
federicachiti.com
Federica Chiti - PhD Candidate
3 shared topicsscience
61match
maxentresearch.com
MaxEnt Research LLC – Applied Math, Physics, and over 150 patents
3 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
61match
rogerhillonline.com
Cosmic Inflation | Roger Eugene Hill
3 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.