Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jaeminkoo.com

Jaemin Koo — Founder, Operator, Builder · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
maxbandy.com
Max Bandy — Founder, Builder, Thinker
1 shared topicsstartups
69match
divvsaxena.com
Divv Saxena - Builder, Investor, Creator
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
fedeponte.com
Federico De Ponte - Builder & Founder
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
robertorubio.com
Roberto Rubio — Founder & CEO at Fluid
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
fareehafatima.com
Fareeha Fatima — Founder, foundrfrnd
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
themeetpatel.com
Meet Patel — I help founders build, operate, and scale startups
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
feltsense.com
We build agentic founders.
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
benbartling.com
Ben Bartling - Technical Founder & Builder
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
blueboltlabs.com
Blue Bolt Labs - MVP Builder for Solo Founders
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
robprice.com
Robertson Price — CEO, Builder, AI Strategist
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
thescrappyoperator.com
The Scrappy Operator
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
growthhire.com
It's Going Good | A Podcast for Operators & Builders
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
3rdcof.com
3rd Cofounder — Home
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
phoia.com
PHOIA — Guided Founder Sprints
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
dnafounders.com
DNA Founders
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
kumarmettu.com
Kumar Mettu | Founder, CEO, Architect, Developer
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
growthspanpartners.com
GrowthSpan — Embedded Operators for Growth
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
mateoploquin.com
Mateo Ploquin — Tech CEO & Serial Founder | Building the Future
1 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.