Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jacobwebber.com

Jacob Webber | Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
andrei-marin.com
Andrei Marin | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
ishaankataria.com
Ishaan Kataria | Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
gavineddington.com
Gavin Eddington | Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
itspolar.dev
polar • developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
svieira.dev
SV Junior Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
2ipper.com
2ipper — Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
anuhas.dev
Full-Stack Developer | AnuhasDev
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
4devs.app
Online Developer Tools
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
odari.dev
Dave Kiribwa | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andrewrminion.com
Andrew Minion | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
cameron-dietz.com
Cameron Dietz | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
garethroll.com
Gareth Roll - Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
resende.app
Gustavo Resende | Programador | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
sherifzaher.com
Sherif Zaher | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
eseqkf.com
ESEQKF - Developer Tools
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kousaila.dev
Kousaila - Backend Developer | DevOps Researcher
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
kooijmanbart.com
Bart Kooijman - Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
annacodes2.com
Anna - Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.