Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jacksonwritereditor.com

Home · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
88match
julielcasey.com
Home
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
82match
adrienneraphel.com
Home
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
80match
joelporemba.com
Home
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
80match
bowerarts.com
Home
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryart-and-photography
79match
dianagallagherwrites.com
Home
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
78match
jenniferjeanwriter.com
Home
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorypoetry
78match
makilien.com
Home
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
77match
janaoliver.com
Home
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryfiction
77match
barbarashoup.com
HOME
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
75match
kennethsmyson.com
Home
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
74match
juliameinwaldwrites.com
Home
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
74match
haveyoueverbook.com
Home
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
74match
celtictalesgalway.com
Home
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryfiction
72match
jmbeal.com
Home
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
72match
anushebabar.com
ANUSHÉ BABAR HALL - home
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
72match
devilsplaypublishing.com
Home
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryfiction
71match
corywilcox.com
Home
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryfiction
71match
jejack.com
Home
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.