Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jackrward.com

Jack Ward · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
bayneri.com
Halil Cetiner
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
camerongoddard.com
Cameron Goddard
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
bearhagen.com
Bjørnar Hagen
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
connorsteele.com
Connor Steele | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
macoun.dev
portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
rhamzthev.com
Rhamsez Thevenin - Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
madschade.com
Madeline Schade
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
garvitgupta.com
Garvit Gupta - Software Engineer - Apple
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
antonyleme.com
Antony Leme
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
cameron-salazar.dev
Cameron Salazar - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
diogomusou.com
Diogo Musou - Senior iOS Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
issaclau.dev
Issac Lau
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
batalin.dev
Software Engineering Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
bastasystems.com
BASTA Systems | Software engineering services
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
hesling.com
Craig Hesling
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
cambaffuto.com
Cam Baffuto
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
ivanfuller.com
Ivan Fuller
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
m-bowker.com
mark-bowker | software-engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.