Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jackruttan.com

Jack Ruttan · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
koaladev.io
Jack Schedel
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
cooperribb.com
Coops
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
gemrealtors.com
Gregory Maulick - Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
andrewmaxey.com
Andrew Maxey
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
camafzal.com
Cameron Afzal | Notion
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
reyrjarroneto.com
Reynaldo Jarro Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
pragalvha.com
Prag
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
cooogus.com
Clara — Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
evanlyall.com
Evan Lyall
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
islamtayeb.dev
Islam Tayeb
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
anmayg.com
Anmay Gupta
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
caitlinandmisha.com
Caitlin & Misha – Participatory projects, shared experiences
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
herbert-george.com
Herb's Thoughts.
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
helltar.com
Helltar - Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
pranavghoghari.com
Pranav Ghoghari
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
kyleetheridge.com
Kyle Etheridge - Personal Website
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
anillingala.com
Anil Lingala — Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
opencomputeproject.be 🇧🇪
Home » Open Compute Project
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.