Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jackkoppa.com

jackkoppa (Jack Koppa) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
oalex.dev
alexlael (Alex Lael) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
bearvue.com
nruffing (Nick Ruffing) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
riansaunders.com
riansaunders (Rian) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
istorry.com
iStorry (Jatinjit Singh) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kolkhis.com
kolkhis (Connor W.) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
rh-webs.com
wagisdev (John Spence) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
reza-sadr.com
reza-sadr (Reza Sadr) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
moertel.io
moertel (Stefanie Fehling) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
dita-users.com
DITA Users · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
etianen.com
etianen (Dave Hall) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
sustainfund.com
SustainFund · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
magiodev.com
magiodev (magiodev.eth) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
sharifmamun.com
sharifmamun (Sharif Mamun) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
1nikolas.dev
1nikolas (Nikolas Spiridakis) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
cainmedia.com
MattCain (Matt Cain) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
complex64.com
complex64 (Johannes Huning) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
henrikjanke.com
HenrikJanke (Henrik) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
kodeslingr.com
jeremycharlesgillespie (Jeremy Gillespie) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.