Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jackienorth.com

Jackie North · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
68match
jennatorren.com
Jenna Torren Author
2 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
68match
ivylenox.com
Ivy Lenox
3 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
68match
breeharlow.com
Bree Harlow
3 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
65match
maisondeloup.com
Maison De Loup
3 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
65match
corayoungbooks.com
Cora Young
3 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
65match
corannaadams.com
Coranna Adams
3 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
64match
bamilsopbooks.com
B. A. Milsop
2 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
63match
jillyharrisonauthor.com
Jilly Harrison
3 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
63match
coracraneauthor.com
Cora Crane
3 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
63match
fiddakabir.com
Fidda Kabir
3 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
62match
joesatoria.com
Joe Satoria │ MM Romance Author
3 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
62match
juliearichman.com
Julie A. Richman
2 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
62match
mandiraynes.com
Mandi Raynes
3 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
62match
ivyflamebooks.com
Ivy Flame
2 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
62match
hazelkford.com
Hazel K Ford
2 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
62match
dhrenfroe.com
DH Renfroe
3 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
62match
elamypride.com
Elamy Pride
3 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
62match
elishalark.com
Elisha Lark
2 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.