Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to iwandejong.com

Iwan de Jong · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
maxdejong.com
Max De Jong
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
2dn.ai
DeepNet Discovery Network (2DN)
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
gromdimon.com
Dzmitry Hramyka - Software Engineer & Co-Founder
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
mattherich.com
Matt Herich
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
bluue.ai
Bluue
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
bluue.com
Bluue
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
cmdlabs.io
COMMAND LABS - AI Implementation
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
alchemycapital.digital
Alchemy Digital
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
cognertia.ai
Cognertia | AI Solutions
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
clicklessai.com
ClicklessAI - AI Automation Solutions
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
insightaiinc.com
InsightAI
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
code17tek.com
Code17
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
codeimpact.ai
Code Impact | AI Implementation for Growing Businesses
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
kuality.ai
Kuality AI - AI & Digital Transformation Partner
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
sofloom.com
Sofloom Solutions
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
abhishekbabu.dev
Abhishek Babu
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
ablestak.com
Ablestak - AI Product Development Company
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
maxkanter.com
Max Kanter
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.