Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to ivanvidal.com

Diseño y desarrollo de Producto + Estrategia de Marca - Ivan Vidal · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
essentialdesign.com
Essential Design - Innovation Strategy, Product & Experience Design
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
kostam.com
Kosta Mijic - Product Strategy & Design
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
camilledufresne.com
Camille Dufresne - Product Design Consultant & Strategist
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
annalouisa.com
Studio Aurora – Transition Strategy & Design
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
anamobe.com
Ana Carolina Bernardo — Principal Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
camicdesigns.com
CAMIC designs LLC – Design and Strategy
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
isdny.com
Innovative Solutions Design
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
inch-punch.co.uk 🇬🇧
Inch Punch UX Consultancy, UX Research and UX Design
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
direapparel.com
DIRE DESIGN HAUS
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
planck-consulting.com
Planck Consulting (Guangzhou) Lighting Design Co., Ltd.
2 shared topicsdesign
61match
gavansgroup.com
Gavan's Group | Luxury Design & Consulting
2 shared topicsdesign
61match
camronturner.com
Camron Turner
2 shared topicsdesign
61match
4dcreativevision.com
Consulting | 4DCreative | United States
2 shared topicsdesign
61match
disruptux.com
DisruptUX
2 shared topicsdesign
61match
helenmaringer.com
Helen Maringer
2 shared topicsdesign
61match
oblironlabs.com
Embedded Design and Consultancy
2 shared topicsdesign
61match
rezacdennis.com
Hi, I'm Kyle
2 shared topicsdesign
61match
dionysiandesigns.com
Dionysian Designs LLC
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.