Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to ivanmandev.com

Ivan Ivanov Mandev · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
subratomandal.com
Subrato Mandal
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
filipemenezes.com
Filipe Constantinov Menezes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
sullivansoftware.dev
Kevin Sullivan | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
sujalmanohar.com
SUJAL MANOHAR
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
byordanov.com
Boyan Yordanov
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
jeroenvankleef.com
Jeroen van Kleef
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
aivan.io
Aivan Monceller | Fullstack JavaScript Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
nikitakhandelwal.com
Nikita Khandelwal — Blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
bunea.com
Razvan | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
albertmanuel.com
Albert Manuel | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
rileydeman.com
Riley de Man | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
rileydeman.dev
Riley de Man | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
rinatussenov.com
Rinat Ussenov - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
akhmadk.com
Akhmad Kakhramonov | Full-Stack Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
indraoctama.com
Software Engineer and Product Manager
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
anushamanne.com
Anusha Manne Raby – Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
dotenglang.com
doteng — English as a Programming Language
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
ronaldverhaegen.com
Ronald Verhaegen · The ideas of a mad man
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.