Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ivangarzon.dev

Ivan Carron | Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
kodeman.dev
Kodeman | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
angellaqian.com
AQ | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
mackcore.io
Mack Core | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
beaujorgensen.com
Beau Jorgensen | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ivanolmo.com
Ivan Olmo - Full stack software developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ivankapunac.com
Ivan Kapunac | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
evan-taylor.com
Evan Taylor | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
evanltaylor.com
Evan Taylor | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
reza-ghaleh.com
Reza Ghaleh | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
diogodev.com
Diogo Duarte | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
korinleck.com
Korin Leck | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
kotsonisdev.com
Ioannis Kotsonis | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
kozsh.com
Aung Myat Ko | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
anshulgera.com
Your Name - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
oelhawary.com
Omar El Hawary | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
cameronlattz.com
Cameron Lattz: Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
diparth.com
Diparth Patel | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
montesariel.com
Ariel Montes | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.