Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ivanfgonzalez.com

Ivan Fernando Gonzalez, PhD » Science. Diversity. Community. · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
cameronmfurlong.com
Cameron M. Furlong – Science Communicator
1 shared topicsscience
68match
diversifiglobal.com
Diversifi | Behavioural science
1 shared topicsscience
68match
monicakortsha.com
Monica Kortsha - Science Communications — Home
1 shared topicsscience
67match
calvinklai.com
Diversity Science Lab
1 shared topicsscience
66match
israelscientometrics.com
The Israeli Scientometrics Academic Community
1 shared topicsscience
66match
researchku.com
Innovation Forward | Khalifa University
1 shared topicsscience
66match
think-lab.co.uk 🇬🇧
Science Communication
1 shared topicsscience
66match
think-lab.uk 🇬🇧
Science Communication
1 shared topicsscience
66match
ivangonzalezcabrera.com
Ivan Gonzalez-Cabrera – Department of Philosophy / Centre for Computational Social Science and Humanities, National University of Singapore
1 shared topicsscience
66match
sweetsciencetribe.com
Sweet Science Tribe
1 shared topicsscience
66match
lydiaelsechain.com
Lydia Chain – Science Journalist
1 shared topicsscience
66match
madcapsofscience.com
Madcaps of Science
1 shared topicsscience
66match
rhiannonboettcher.com
Boettcher Science Home
1 shared topicsscience
65match
3mbed.com
3MBED – Science Communication & Design for Biotech and Research
1 shared topicsscience
65match
connecttoscience.com
Science Connections - Connect to Science
1 shared topicsscience
65match
sciencenetwork.uk 🇬🇧
UCCF Science Network
1 shared topicsscience
65match
communitylabs.com
Community Labs
1 shared topicsscience
65match
compmotifs.com
Science through Computation
1 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.