Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to itsjamie.dev

Jamie Murphy · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
carinamaleski.com
Carina Maleski
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
andy-yao.com
Andy Yao | Capital Markets Software Developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
dlaisoft.com
homepage
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
computersandpeople.com
Computers & People
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kobelei.com
Kobe Lei - Software Developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
carladi.com
Carl Adi
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
essenceofcode.com
Essence of Code – Random Thoughts on Software Development
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
gatheringagility.com
Gathering Agility
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
andrewyule.dev
Home | andrewyule.dev
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
magiteker.com
Magiteker – Developer Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
anthonyvscode.com
Anthony Zigenbine's Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
majingze.com
Jingze Ma | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
mogoni.dev
Mogoni
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
7arp.com
neontuna
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
carogifts.com
Gabriel Uribe - Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
shivambhadani.com
Shivam Bhadani
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewhxue.com
Andrew Xue
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andreasellwanger.com
Andreas Ellwanger
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.