Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to itsdatta.com

Datta — Software Engineer & Builder · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
kolakachi.com
Kolawole Lawal — Software Engineer & Builder
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
rishikeshsuvarna.com
Rishikesh Suvarna — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andreitalpa.com
Andrei Talpa — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
hekdev.com
Erik Kleiman — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
rijinmk.com
Rijin MK — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ethanloh.com
Ethan Loh — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
camipg.com
Camila Pozas — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
dirkdevelops.com
Dirk Knibbe — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
isaxcode.com
Mohammed Isa — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ivan-domain.com
Ivan — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
surajd.com
Suraj Dudhatra — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
calebberhane.com
Caleb B — Software Engineer & AI Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
andreafuso.dev
Andrea Fuso — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
0xomer.com
Omer | Software Engineer & Instructor
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
krauchuk.dev
Ihar Krauchuk — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
reynaud.dev
Filipe Reynaud — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
obinnachidi.com
Obinna Chidi — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
cameronrz.dev
Cameron Ramirez — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.