Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to itsdaniel0.com

Daniel Chenery — Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
mackcore.io
Mack Core | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
reza-ghaleh.com
Reza Ghaleh | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ankacakan.com
Anka Cakan - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
paracosm.mx 🇲🇽
Gerardo Nille - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
cakenes.com
Cakenes - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
kodeman.dev
Kodeman | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
ricabaguhin.com
Rica — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
shoaibsarwar.com
Shoaib Sarwar - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
anshulgera.com
Your Name - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
batuhankas.dev
Batuhan Kaş · Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
koekblik.dev
Ruben Kuijer — Lead Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
koekblik.com
Ruben Kuijer — Lead Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
konarobinson.com
Connor Robinson — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
reynersubrata.com
Reyner Subrata | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
richardhan.com
Richard Han — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
hectorruizlaph.com
Hector Ruiz - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
heyconrado.dev
Conrado Gómez | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
ivankapunac.com
Ivan Kapunac | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.