Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to itri.com

ITRI International · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
andreavaugan.com
Andrea Vaugan — European tech and international development
2 shared topicsstartups
64match
svastilabs.com
Svasti Innovation Labs
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
64match
isleinnovation.com
Isle Innovation
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
63match
ansime.com
ANSIME INNOVATION
2 shared topicsstartups
63match
susharinnovations.com
Sushar Innovations
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
63match
bdidatacenter.com
Blue Diamond Innovation
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
63match
korbaxinnovations.com
KORBAX INNOVATIONS LLC
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
62match
civilisedbank.co.uk 🇬🇧
UK Tech News, Opinion & Interviews | CivilisedBank
2 shared topicsstartups
62match
kozhuhov.com
Andrey Kozhuhov — Fractional CTO & Tech Entrepreneur
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
62match
playvitech.com
PlayviTech Innovations & Solutions
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
62match
connectcascadia.com
Home | Cascadia Innovation Corridor
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
62match
suprainno.com
Suprainno — Innovation Think Tank
2 shared topicsstartups
62match
comotionlabs.com
CoMotion Labs
2 shared topicsstartups
62match
swiftcoast.com
SwiftCoast | Innovation Meets Humanity
2 shared topicsstartups
62match
euroignite.com
EuroIgnite – European Innovation Projects
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
62match
konjor.com
Konjor Labs | Engineering & Digital Innovation
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
62match
swiftcorporations.com
Swift Corporation – Tech Startup Website
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
62match
it-startup.com
IT-Startup - Aide a la creation de startup aux US
2 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.