Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to isdaniel.com

danielrlatham (Daniel Latham) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
84match
newmanhaasracing.com
danielcary (Daniel) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
nilkoush.dev
nilkoush (Nikolas) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
alecv.tech
alecvdp (Alec) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
guru-gaming.com
klmunday (KLM) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
aaix.dev
aaix (aidan) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
labiod.dev
rlabiod (Ruben Labiod) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
softwareblair.dev
SoftwareBlair · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
armsnyder.com
armsnyder (Adam Snyder) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
a-jd.dev
a-jd (AJ Dave) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
inueni.com
Inueni · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
rokit.dev
trey-k · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
softwaresing.dev
SoftwareSing (soft) · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
dmizr.com
dmizr (David Mizrahi) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
1lt.dev
1LtFord · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
aericio.net
Aericio · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
faqeel.dev
faqeel (Fares) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
kylemichaelfox.com
kfox112 (Kyle) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
sonodavide.com
sonodavide (davide) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.