Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to iscableoneshitty.com

Tyler Fontaine · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
containers.dev
Development containers
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
mountaintech.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - MountainTech
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
rifont.com
Richard Fontein's blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
isblu.dev
Lison Mendis | Software Developer for Fast, Maintainable Systems
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
kogifi.com
Digital Experience Platform, Enterprise CMS | Kogifi
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
hicris.com
HiCris | Shopify Developer for Themes & Apps
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
computerfarmer.com
Computer Farmer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
henriquemenegale.com
Henrique Menegale | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
hesipeng.com
Sipeng's Blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
hiimstevejin.com
Steve Jin
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
cainetech.com
CaineTech | Home
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
mohakn.com
Mohak's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
shaunakc.com
Shaunak
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
jaacielb.dev
Jaaciel's Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
aniketrawat.com
Home | Aniket Rawat | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
hejason.com
Jason He | Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
mabdullahz.com
Abdullah Z.
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
ricardopbarbosa.com
Ricardo Barbosa
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.