Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ironzebra.com

Herman Schaaf · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
alanschussman.com
Alan Schussman
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
acertainprecision.net
Marc Schwieterman
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
adamdavidson.me
Adam Davidson
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
benheyderman.com
Ben Heyderman
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
benjaminschagerl.com
Benjamin Schagerl About
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
1mansystems.com
1 Man Systems
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
maxniederman.com
Max Niederman
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
ackermann.io
Ryan Ackermann
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
armanmadani.com
Arman Madani | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
dogeared.dev
Micah Silverman
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
romandunets.com
Roman Dunets
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
fdatoo.dev
Fynn Datoo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewesherman.net
Andrew Sherman — Software engineering leader
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
armandashtipour.com
Arman Dashtipour
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bforbloggers.com
BforBloggers - Software, Tutorials and Guides
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
kvmet.com
kvmet
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
2color.me
Daniel Norman - Developer, maker, and blogger
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
adamschultzer.com
Adam Schultzer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.