similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to iranee.de

Iranee alternatives & similar sites

Arabisch Training & Arabien Coaching - Iranee SprachTraining & Interkulturelles Coaching — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Language Learning →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
nations.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	nations – Sprachtrainings & interkulturelle Kompetenz seit 1978	DE de	language-learning WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
interculture-trainer.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	DEUTSCH - Interkulturelle-Trainings-PLIETSCH	DE de	language-learning Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
interkulturelle-trainings-plietsch.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	DEUTSCH - Interkulturelle-Trainings-PLIETSCH	DE de	language-learning Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
phillingua.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	philLingua - Coaching und Fremdsprachentraining in Hamburg	DE de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
karg-sprachtraining.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Karg Sprachtraining	DE de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heather-language-training.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Heather Language Training \| Business English & Sprachcoaching in München	DE de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
isk-training.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	ISK Training GmbH \| ISK Training GmbH	DE de	language-learning TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
keup-training.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Marion Keup Training, endlich flüssig Deutsch sprechen - Marion Keup Training	DE de	language-learning Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
language-progress.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Sprachschule Frankfurt Sprachtraining Sprachkurse Frankfurt	DE de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
proenglisch.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Sprachschule und Training	DE de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
biztalk.at ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Sprachtraining und Dokumentation - wordbird	AT de	language-learning WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
juttasprachtraining.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	German Language Coaching in Frankfurt \| Jutta Petznick Sprachunterricht & Coaching	DE de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ohne-angst-lernen.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Englisch Nachhilfe - Unterstützung & Training in Hof, Rehau, Regnitzlosau	DE de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ichbinreza.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	ICHBINREZA DEUTSCH SPRACHTRAINING	DE de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jdlanguageservices.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Sprachtrainer für Englisch in Ulm	DE de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iks-sprachtrainings.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	IKS Sprachtrainings Regensburg - Business Sprachen	DE de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
oconnortraining.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	O'Connor - Sprachkurse und Kommunikationstraining aus Ulm	DE de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nataliedeckers.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	SprachCoaching Deutsch für Expats	DE de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.