Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to irajakbar.com

Iraj Akbar · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
anoopkaur.org
Anoop Kaur | Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
kunalraj.dev
Kunalraj Singh
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
matthewrubino.com
Portfolio - Matthew Rubino
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
rohanvasudev.com
Rohan Vasudev - Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
aaronmyburgh.com
Aaron Myburgh
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
matteorobidoux.com
Matteo Robidoux - Portfolio | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
softedgehub.com
SoftEdgeHub
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
intellectdev.com
Intellect Dev
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
arnavnepal.com
Arnav Nepal | Software developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
arslanali.io
Arslan Ali Online - Portfolio and Articles
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
ankitdwivedi.tech
Ankit Dwivedi
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
cmutuberria.com
Carlos J. Pérez - Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
nicklina.com
Nick Lina - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
thelinuxkid.com
Andrés Restrepo - Los Angeles, California | about.me
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
alchemyserv.com
Alchemy App
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
abdulyusuf.me
Abdulrahman Yusuf || Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
mdpsites.com
Matt Poole / Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ronaldbarrera.com
John Doe | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.