similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to iptagroup.com

Independent Physical Therapy Associates · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

IQ Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

befitphysicaltherapy.com

BE Fit Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

360physicaltherapy.com

360 Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

MAX Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

C&B Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Pick PT Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

alchemistpt.com

Alchemist Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

ahnewphysicaltherapy.com

AHNew Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

adamsphysicaltherapy.com

Adams Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Arogya Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Bolton Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Alameda Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Prevail Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

bodyprotherapy.com

BodyPro Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Bodikey Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Maughan Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

thepinpointpt.com

Home - Pinpoint Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

advancedtherapync.com

Advanced Physical Therapy

1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.