Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to invition.dev

iNViTiON (MiX) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
l-oj.com
larry-oj · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
nflverse.com
nflverse · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
mattchard.com
mchar7 (Matt) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
benedikt-lohse.dev
LinuxTux23 (bl) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
dita-users.com
DITA Users · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
robertsenseman.com
rsenseman (Rob) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
andrewlmartin.dev
AndrewR3K (Andrew) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
berankovi.net
Kobzol (Jakub Beránek) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
aroji.com
glennon (Alan Glennon) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
arogy.com
glennon (Alan Glennon) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
thepotato.dev
ThePotatoGuy · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
clineventures.com
tom-cline (Tom Cline) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
arjen.dev
arjenbos (Arjen Bos) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
rockhugox.com
PedroBuffon (Pedro Buffon) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kybouw.com
kybouw (Kyle Bouwman) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kylebouwman.com
kybouw (Kyle Bouwman) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
mb-media.net
vonWeihermuehle · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
nexusgo.app
tkdeng (TKD Engineer) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.