Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to intink.com

Mike Young: Game Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
interactivitiesink.com
Mike Young: Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
rkleyn.com
Ramana Kleyn - Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
robmsantos.com
Rob M Santos - Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
kungfusquirrel.com
Andrew Weldon: Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
cameronconnick.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cameron Connick | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
rohogames.com
Rob Howard – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
matteobreda.com
Matteo Breda Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
bnguyenportfolio.com
Bryan Nguyen – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
andreypvelkov.com
Andrey Velkov — Lead Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
arosioalberto.com
Alberto Arosio – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
arrowplaygamedesign.com
Home - Arrowplay Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
cliftonrice.com
Clifton Rice: Game Design - Games
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
kryptekdev.com
Kryptek Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
alexscrivner.com
Alex Scrivner — Game Designer & Artist
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
guilhermekorn.com
Guilherme Korn • Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
kylerowan.com
Kyle Rowan – Game Designer & Writer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
kylesrowan.com
Kyle Rowan – Game Designer & Writer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
maxstucker.com
Max Stucker Game Design - Home
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.