Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to internationaldesigngroup.com

Flos B&B Italia Group | Global high-end design leader · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
rohitwalia.com
Rohit Walia - Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
gregmeek.com
Greg Meek — UX Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
kristinarosta.com
Kristina Rostorotsky — Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
maxdiamondhead.com
maxdiamond – design leader
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
pixelczar.com
Will Smith - Product Designer & Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
kylewailin.com
Kyle Wai Lin, Creative Director & Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
mathelme.com
Mat Helme - Product and Brand Design Lead at Google
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
arseni.com
Arseni Harkunou - Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
bonzaiagency.com
Bonzai - Global Design Company
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
felixbenito.com
Portfolio — Felix Benito, Design Lead
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
bdgpartnership.co.uk 🇬🇧
British Design Group | Pre-registration form
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
bdgpartners.co.uk 🇬🇧
British Design Group | Pre-registration form
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
clkaough.com
Graphic design | KWC Design Group
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
greybirddesigngroup.com
Greybird Design Group |
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
thereviere.com
Luxury Branding & Graphic Design | High-End Visual Identity & Packaging
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
adamhaas.net
Adam Haas – Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
boisedesigngroup.com
Boise Graphic Design Group | Meetup
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
farzana.io
Farzana Sedillo | Design Leader & Lecturer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.