similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to interlit-online.de

Interlit Online alternatives & similar sites

InterLit – Studien zu Literatur und Geschlecht — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Books And Literature →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
international-literature.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	International Literature	DE de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lunaro-books.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Lunaro Books - Ihr Ziel für klassische Literatur und Kunst	de	books-and-literature Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
berggasse8.at ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Berggasse 8 – Kunst – Kultur – Literatur – Queer	AT de	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
infosoftware.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - Literatur im Kontext	DE de	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hamburgerliteraturreisen.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Hamburger Literaturreisen	DE de	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
die-gartenlaube.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Die Gartenlaube – Die Welt der Literatur, Menschen & Medien	de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dr-oliver-gliech.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Domingino-Verlag: Bibliografien zu Politik, Gesellschaft und Geschichte	de	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hotlist2009.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Buchbarometer – Deutsche Literatur-Toplisten im Überblick	DE de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
poesierausch.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Poesierausch \| Literatur- und Kulturblog - Poesierausch	de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
schoengeistinnen.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Schöngeistinnen – Der Frauen-Literatur-Blog	de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bauernerde.at ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	MARIO SCHLEMBACH – Schriftsteller und Totengräber	AT de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pocolit.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	poco.lit. – Diskussionsplattform für Postkoloniale Literatur	de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
axeltimopurr.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Axel Timo Purr - Literatur, Afrika & Kunst	de	books-and-literature WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
buchhandlung-lesezeichen.at ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Buchhandlung in Voitsberg: Bücher und Geschenke kaufen	AT de	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
internetmeme.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Internet-Meme — kurz und geek	DE de	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lust-auf-literatur.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Lust auf Literatur? Rezensionen auf meinem Literatur Blog	de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
politbuch.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Politbuch \| Unabhängiges eJournal für Politik und politische Literatur ISBN 3054-1794	de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
savingson-dale.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Leselust Frankfurt – Deine literarische Heimat	de	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.