similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to interactive-net.de

Interactive Net alternatives & similar sites

INTERACTIVE Computer Systems GmbH — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ico-server.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Cipherlab Scanner - ICO Innovative Computer GmbH	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
icoholding.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Cipherlab Scanner - ICO Innovative Computer GmbH	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ico-service.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Cipherlab Scanner - ICO Innovative Computer GmbH	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
icoservice.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Cipherlab Scanner - ICO Innovative Computer GmbH	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heinen-ics.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	HEINEN ICS: Individuelle Computersicherheit	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
heinen-ics.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	HEINEN ICS: Individuelle Computersicherheit	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
heinenics.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	HEINEN ICS: Individuelle Computersicherheit	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
icos-gmbh.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	HEINEN ICS: Individuelle Computersicherheit	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
it-forensik-labor.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	IT-Forensik / Computer-Forensik / Digital-Forensik	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hardware-security-labor.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Cyber-Physical Systems - Fraunhofer SIT	DE de	information-and-network-security TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hardware-security.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Cyber-Physical Systems - Fraunhofer SIT	DE de	information-and-network-security TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hardwaresecurity-lab.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Cyber-Physical Systems - Fraunhofer SIT	DE de	information-and-network-security TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hardwaresecuritylabor.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Cyber-Physical Systems - Fraunhofer SIT	DE de	information-and-network-security TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hardwaresicherheit.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Cyber-Physical Systems - Fraunhofer SIT	DE de	information-and-network-security TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hardwaresicherheitslab.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Cyber-Physical Systems - Fraunhofer SIT	DE de	information-and-network-security TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hardwaresicherheitslabor.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Cyber-Physical Systems - Fraunhofer SIT	DE de	information-and-network-security TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kivicore.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	KiviCore \| We secure embedded systems	DE de	information-and-network-security HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
innova-solutions.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Innova Solutions GmbH	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.